Nigeria’s House of Representatives has reignited discussions on electoral reform by proposing a constitutional amendment that would require all elections, from the presidency to local councils, to be held on the same day.
The proposed legislative change would mandate the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to conduct presidential, governorship, National Assembly, State House of Assembly, and local government elections simultaneously. Advocates argue that this redesign of the electoral calendar could cut costs drastically, improve logistical efficiency, and reduce opportunities for post-election manipulation and violence.
Supporters such as Ladipo Johnson, spokesman for the New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP), contend that consolidating elections into a single day would lessen financial pressures on the country and reduce disruptions to economic activities caused by repeated election holidays. Similarly, the Labour Party emphasizes how synchronized polls could diminish voter apathy by motivating citizens to participate in all contests at once, boosting overall turnout. Many also stress that pooling resources and election agents in this manner can increase transparency at polling stations.
Nevertheless, critics caution that Nigeria’s current electoral infrastructure may not be ready for such a sweeping change. Security concerns top the list, with experts like APC’s Bala Ibrahim warning that the nation’s limited police force might struggle to effectively safeguard the multiplied voting stations all at once. Others worry about the strain on INEC’s logistical capabilities, noting that counting and collating results for five different elections in one day could overwhelm officials and prolong vote tallying well into the night, creating fertile ground for fraud.
Prominent political analysts echo these reservations, showing the diverse literacy levels among voters and the potential confusion arising from handling multiple ballot papers simultaneously. They suggest that staggered elections, while imperfect, offer manageable intervals for verifying results and addressing challenges.
Even voices within the opposition suggest a compromise, with some proposing a two-phase approach separating executive and legislative elections rather than an all-at-once model. Former INEC officials and various election observers have voiced skepticism about the feasibility of this reform without accompanying technological upgrades, such as expanded use of electronic voting and real-time result transmission.
Chief Chekwas Okorie, a seasoned elder statesman, said
As a former advocate of synchronised polls, I believe holding all elections on a single day will save the nation significant resources and reduce economic disruptions caused by election-related shutdowns. With the proper technology in place, we can also ensure faster, more credible results
Conversely, Dr. Umar Ardo of the Social Democratic Party warned
Combining five elections into just one day may overstretch INEC’s capacities and heighten risks of manipulation. The approach should be pragmatic, focusing on strengthening electoral management first
Bala Ibrahim, speaking personally for the ruling party APC, said
The biggest challenge is security personnel availability. Handling nationwide security needs for simultaneous elections on such a scale is not feasible right now.
As the bill awaits further deliberations and a public hearing, Nigeria faces critical decisions about balancing cost-efficiency and logistical practicality in its electoral processes. While enthusiasm for reform is evident across many quarters, so too is the recognition that successful implementation demands adequate preparation, technological advancement, and political will to cultivate trust in the democratic exercise.
Leave a comment